Summary
A pulmonology scribe should draft a note that carries the lung function values, the control or breathlessness scores, the exacerbation count, the inhaler technique observed and the plan, then the letter to the patient, the action plan and any referral to rehabilitation or the ILD team. wai drafts each of these from one consultation for the respiratory physician to sign, suggests ICD-10 and SNOMED CT codes from the note, and runs the reviews, results and recalls a respiratory clinic depends on.
A respiratory clinic sees asthma that will not settle, COPD with another winter of exacerbations, breathlessness without a diagnosis and interstitial lung disease that needs watching every six months. Every review turns on numbers, FEV1 and FVC, gas transfer, FeNO, eosinophils and oxygen saturation, and on what the physician watches, such as how the patient actually uses the inhaler. The hours go on writing those numbers into letters, explaining inhaler changes to the patient and the GP, and chasing the lung function tests and reviews that keep slipping.
See it in your clinicSee a COPD review become a signed note, a letter to the patient and a rehabilitation referral.
Request a demo| Document | What the draft contains | What the clinician checks |
|---|---|---|
| Asthma review note | Control questionnaire score, exacerbations and oral steroid courses, FeNO and eosinophils, adherence, inhaler technique observed, treatment step and plan | Values and units, the inhaler and dose, the step taken |
| COPD review note | MRC dyspnoea grade, exacerbations, post-bronchodilator spirometry, smoking status, inhaler technique, vaccinations, rehabilitation | FEV1 percent predicted and ratio, pack-years, the device named |
| ILD clinic note | Symptoms, exposures and drugs asked about, FVC and gas transfer with trend, imaging as narrated, MDT outcome, treatment and prognosis discussion | Trend values and dates, the MDT wording, what was said about prognosis |
| Letter to the patient, GP copied | What the tests show in plain words, the inhaler change and how to use it, what to do if symptoms worsen, next review | Plain language, device and dose, the safety advice |
| Personalised action plan | Usual treatment, signs of worsening, what to take and when to seek help, on the clinic's own template | Doses and thresholds match the plan agreed |
| Fit-to-fly or referral letter | Diagnosis, current treatment and stability for a flight, or the question for rehabilitation, the ILD team or a thoracic surgeon | Dates, oxygen needs stated as the physician said them |
The respiratory note, built on numbers
An asthma review follows the joint NICE, BTS and SIGN guideline. Symptom control is scored with a validated questionnaire such as the Asthma Control Test, and adherence and inhaler technique are checked at every asthma review and before any change of treatment.1 In adults with a history suggesting asthma, a FeNO of 50 ppb or more, or an eosinophil count above the laboratory reference range, confirms the diagnosis.1 The draft records each value with its unit, the exacerbations and oral steroid courses since the last visit, and the treatment step agreed.
A COPD review grades breathlessness on the MRC dyspnoea scale, records post-bronchodilator spirometry with FEV1 as a percentage of predicted and the FEV1/FVC ratio, and covers smoking, vaccinations, pulmonary rehabilitation and the self-management plan, inhaler technique included.2 An ILD note records the exposures, drugs and connective tissue symptoms asked about, FVC and gas transfer with their trend, and the imaging as the physician describes it. NICE advises that idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis is diagnosed only by consensus of the multidisciplinary team, and that spirometry and gas transfer are repeated at 6 and 12 months after diagnosis to measure the rate of decline.3
wai does not connect to spirometers or lung function systems. The numbers enter the draft when the physician reads them out with the patient, and the template holds a field for each one, so a missing gas transfer value shows as a gap rather than a guess. A safety-netting check runs on the draft, and risk scores are suggested for the clinician to apply.
Codes are suggested from the note with the line each rests on, for the physician to confirm. In ICD-10, the edition used in the UK and the Gulf, typical codes are J45.9 Asthma, unspecified, J44.9 Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified, J44.1 Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with acute exacerbation, unspecified, J84.1 Other interstitial pulmonary diseases with fibrosis and J47 Bronchiectasis. US practices see ICD-10-CM forms such as J45.909 Unspecified asthma, uncomplicated, and J84.112 Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. SNOMED CT concepts are suggested alongside, and procedure codes for bronchoscopy or lung function testing, CPT in the US and OPCS in the UK, stay with the clinic's coder.
The letters a respiratory clinic sends, and to whom
The Academy of Medical Royal Colleges recommends writing most outpatient letters to the patient with a copy to the GP, and says this should be the default setting for an AI scribe.5 In a respiratory clinic that letter explains what the breathing tests showed in plain words, names the new inhaler and how to use it, and says what to do if breathing worsens. The GP copy matters because the GP usually takes over the prescription.
The personalised asthma action plan and the COPD self-management plan go to the patient on the clinic's own template, with the doses and the signs of worsening agreed in the room. Referral letters go to pulmonary rehabilitation, to the ILD multidisciplinary team, to a thoracic surgeon or to a sleep service, each carrying the question for the specialist and drafted from the whole record. Medication change letters cover a step up or down in inhaled treatment or a new antifibrotic.
Fit-to-fly letters matter in a respiratory practice, for patients with lung disease planning a flight, and record the diagnosis, current treatment and any oxygen need as the physician stated it. UK fit notes go out on the official form. For the structure of the referral itself, see the referral letter, and for patients whose breathlessness is part of a sleep problem, AI scribe for sleep medicine.
Respiratory care in the patient's own language
wai captures consultations in 60 languages, among them English, Arabic, Spanish, French, Portuguese, Italian, Russian, Polish, Turkish, Urdu and Mandarin. English can be mixed in one consultation with Spanish, French, Portuguese, Russian, Italian, Dutch, German, Hindi or Japanese, and the other languages are captured in the language spoken.
Inhaler technique and action plans are where language decides the outcome. A patient who hears the steps in their own language, and takes home a summary of them in that language, has a better chance of following them. The signed note is written in English for the record, or in another language the clinic chooses, and the patient's summary, with the inhaler steps and the signs of worsening, can be translated beside it. Crisis and emergency numbers stay exactly as written. The detail is on the multilingual AI scribe page.
Clinic software for pulmonology clinics, around the review cycle
A respiratory clinic runs on reviews that recur. In wai Admin, calls, email, web forms and WhatsApp messages land in one thread per patient, and replies are drafted in the clinic's voice for a person to approve before they are sent. Patients request the lung function slot and the clinic appointment through booking links that read each physician's calendar, cancellations backfill from the waitlist, and reminders go out. Deposits, invoices, payment links and insurer invoices run through the clinic's own Stripe account.
Proactive care sends the recall for the annual asthma or COPD review, the ILD lung function at 6 and 12 months and the repeat bloods, each message approved by a person. In the UK, pathology orders such as eosinophils, IgE or alpha-1 antitrypsin go out and results come back through TDL, and private prescriptions for inhalers are issued and signed through SignatureRx. Each result reaches the patient with the physician's own comment and a plain explanation of each marker.
The after-visit companion sends the signed plan home in plain words and tracks the rehabilitation referral, the new prescription and the follow-up until each is done. Before the next review the physician sees a sourced brief of the patient, with every exacerbation, steroid course and lung function result traced to the letter or visit it came from. For patients with severe disease, a family member or carer can have access with the patient's consent. The full front desk is on the clinic management software page.
One COPD review, start to finish
Take a 61-year-old former smoker with COPD, 40 pack-years, who has needed oral steroids twice since the spring. The physician asks about breathlessness, cough, sputum and sleep, grades breathlessness at MRC 3, reads the post-bronchodilator spirometry aloud, FEV1 52% of predicted and an FEV1/FVC ratio of 0.58, and watches the patient use a dry powder inhaler without breathing out first. They agree a change to a single triple-therapy inhaler, demonstrate it, refer to pulmonary rehabilitation and check flu and pneumococcal vaccination.
The draft note holds the history, the MRC grade, both spirometry values, the exacerbation count, the technique error observed and the plan. The suggested code is J44.9 Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified, tied to the line where the diagnosis was discussed. The physician corrects the smoking history, which the draft had heard as 14 pack-years, names the new device exactly, confirms the code and signs.
Three documents go out. The letter to the patient explains the spirometry in plain words, the new inhaler and the steps to use it, and what to do at the start of a flare, with a copy to the GP to take over the prescription. The rehabilitation referral states the MRC grade and the goal of walking to the shops without stopping. A medication change letter records the switch. The front desk sends a booking link for an inhaler technique check in four weeks and sets the annual review recall, each approved by a person.
The evidence behind wai's method
The note is one part of the day the evidence measures. In a randomised trial of 238 outpatient physicians across 14 specialties at UCLA Health, the ambient scribe with a significant effect cut the time spent writing each note by about 41 seconds, against 18 seconds in usual care.6 At The Permanente Medical Group, 3,442 physicians used an ambient scribe across 303,266 encounters in its first ten weeks.7 wai is built on that finding, so it takes on the letters, the recalls and the bookings as well as the note.
Respiratory medicine has a documented gap that a written record helps close. Across 144 studies of directly observed inhaler use, 31% of patients showed correct technique and 31% poor technique, with no improvement over 40 years.4 NICE, BTS and SIGN ask for technique to be checked at every asthma review,1 and a template field for the technique observed makes that check part of every note.
A draft stays a draft until a person signs it. The Academy of Medical Royal Colleges says the clinician checks every document a scribe produces,5 and wai holds every draft until the physician signs it. In a systematic review of 33 studies, 76% found at least one outcome better when patient and physician shared a language other than English.8
Measured in a working clinic. At The Wellness in London, which runs on wai every day, every clinician has 15 hours a week back, as published in the customer story.9
Where to start
Start with one physician's COPD and asthma review list. Build the review template with the control score, the spirometry fields, the exacerbation count and a field for inhaler technique, run it for the first week, and count corrections to values, devices and doses. In the second week add the letter to the patient and the action plan, and switch on the annual review and ILD lung function recalls in wai Admin.
Read what the research says about AI scribe errors before the pilot, and compare other specialties on the specialties hub. The scribe is described on the wai Clinicians page.
Bring the asthma action plan or COPD letter you use today. We show a review filling it.
Request a demoFrequently asked questions
Can an AI scribe read spirometry results directly?
wai does not connect to spirometers or lung function systems. The values enter the draft when the physician reads them out, and the template holds a field for each one so nothing is guessed.
What should clinic software for pulmonology clinics do?
It should book lung function tests and reviews, take deposits, invoice insurers and send the recalls for annual reviews and repeat lung function. wai Admin does each of these, with a person approving every message before it is sent.
Can the consultation be held in the patient's language?
Yes, in any of 60 languages, among them English, Arabic, Spanish, French, Portuguese, Italian, Russian, Polish, Turkish, Urdu and Mandarin. The signed note is in English, and the patient's summary, inhaler steps included, can be translated beside it.
Which codes does wai suggest in a respiratory clinic?
ICD-10 and SNOMED CT codes from the note, such as J45.9 Asthma, unspecified, or J44.9 Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified, each shown with the line it rests on. Procedure codes for bronchoscopy and lung function testing stay with the clinic's coder.
Does the note record inhaler technique?
Yes, when the physician says what they observed. NICE, BTS and SIGN ask for technique and adherence to be checked at every asthma review, so the template carries a field for it.1
Is anything sent before the physician signs?
No. wai holds every note and letter as a draft until the clinician reviews, edits and signs it, and every message from the front desk is approved by a person before it goes.
Sources
- Asthma, diagnosis, monitoring and chronic asthma management (NG245), read 24 October 2026
- Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in over 16s, diagnosis and management (NG115), read 24 October 2026
- Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in adults, diagnosis and management (CG163), read 24 October 2026
- Systematic Review of Errors in Inhaler Use, Has Patient Technique Improved Over Time?, read 24 October 2026
- Please write to me, guidance for writing directly to patients (April 2026 update), read 24 October 2026
- Ambient AI Scribes in Clinical Practice, A Randomized Trial, read 24 October 2026
- Ambient Artificial Intelligence Scribes to Alleviate the Burden of Clinical Documentation, read 24 October 2026
- A Systematic Review of the Impact of Patient-Physician Non-English Language Concordance on Quality of Care and Outcomes, read 24 October 2026
- The Wellness, customer story, read 24 October 2026
End the respiratory list with every review, plan and recall ready to sign.
Fifteen minutes on your own workflows, with one of your real pulmonology consultations. If it is a fit we reply within 24 hours.
Partner with us
See it on your own patients, then build it with us
Thirty minutes on your own patients, doctors and rules, in your market. We reply within one working day, and the clinics that partner with us early shape what we build next.
See what wai does between the visits
