Summary
Corti and Wai do different jobs. Corti is an API platform for developers building healthcare software, with usage-based pricing and EU-hosted models. Wai is the finished platform a private clinic runs on, covering booking, front desk, consult, note and follow-up at a published price with no engineering team required.
This is an unusual comparison because the two products do different jobs. Corti is an API platform for developers building healthcare software. Wai is a finished AI platform for private clinics.
If you are building a healthcare product, Corti belongs on your list and Wai is not for you. If you run a clinic, Wai is for you and Corti is the raw material products like it are built from.
Raw material for builders, finished product for clinics. Be honest about which one you are.
Book a demo| Question | Corti | Wai |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | API platform for developers | Finished AI platform for clinics |
| Who buys it | Software teams | Private clinics |
| Pricing | Published, usage-based credits | Published, on the pricing page |
| Free start | Yes, $50 of credits | Yes, see the product on your own clinic first |
| Engineering required | Yes | No |
| EU data residency | Yes, EU-hosted and sovereign options | Configured per clinic |
| Ambient scribe out of the box | No, you build it | Yes, plus the rest of the clinic |
Where Corti is genuinely strong
Corti gives a development team medical speech-to-text, clinical text generation, coding and agent APIs with public usage pricing and a free starting balance. That transparency is rare and welcome in healthcare AI.
For European builders it may be the default choice. EU-hosted models, sovereign cloud deployments, and ISO 27001, 27017 and 27018 with zero nonconformities answer the data-residency questions most vendors dodge.
Where Wai is different
Wai is not an ingredient. It is the finished platform a private clinic runs on, covering the booking page, the front desk, the consult, the note and the follow-up, configured for your clinic and live in days.
The price is published in full on our pricing page and there is no engineering team required. The comparison only exists when a clinic Googles for a scribe and lands on a developer platform.
Which one is for you
Building healthcare software with an engineering team, especially in Europe. Talk to Corti.
Running a private clinic and want the AI already built, configured for how you work, at a published price. That is Wai.
Bring your own clinic to it. Thirty minutes, and you see it on your workflows.
Book a demoFrequently asked questions
Is Corti cheaper than Wai?
They are not comparable line items. Corti charges per API call, $0.0065 per minute of speech-to-text for example, but you pay engineers to build and maintain the product around it. Wai is a finished platform at a published subscription price. For a clinic, Wai costs less in every honest accounting because there is nothing to build.
Does Wai use Corti's APIs?
We do not comment on our vendor stack. What we can say is that Wai is a complete product, not an assembly of third-party APIs a clinic would need to integrate itself.
Can Corti power an ambient scribe?
Yes, that is one of its main use cases, and its pricing page includes a worked example for ambient scribing. But the scribe itself, the product clinicians touch, is what its customers build. Wai is already built.
What does Corti give a development team?
Corti gives a development team medical speech-to-text, clinical text generation, coding and agent APIs with public usage pricing and a free starting balance. That transparency is rare and welcome in healthcare AI.
Who should use Corti rather than Wai?
Building healthcare software with an engineering team, especially in Europe. Talk to Corti.
See it on your own clinic
Fifteen minutes on your workflows. If it is a fit we reply within 24 hours.

